ESDiT Publications

@article{Puzio2024,

title = {From an Eco-Relational Approach to Ecologically Responsible Robot Ethics},

author = {Anna Puzio},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13347-024-00772-6

https://www.esdit.nl/wp-content/uploads/s13347-024-00772-6.pdf},

doi = {10.1007/s13347-024-00772-6},

issn = {2210-5441},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-07-02},

urldate = {2024-07-02},

journal = {Philosophy & Technology},

volume = {37},

issue = {3},

pages = {83},

abstract = {In this reply, I respond to Joshua C. Gellers’ commentary on my article “Not Relational Enough? Towards an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics” (Puzio, 2024a), in which I present a deeply relational, “eco-relational approach”. This approach asserts that it is necessary to consider the relationality with non-human entities such as animals and technology on a deeper level than has been done in robot ethics so far. This disrupts traditional ethical concepts. In his commentary “Not Ecological Enough: A Commentary on an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics” (2024), Gellers raises criticisms of my method and the consequences of the eco-relational approach. In this reply, I address these criticisms and focus especially on the ecological responsibility of the eco-relational approach.},

keywords = {Eco-Relational Approach, Robot ethics},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}