2023
Hopster, Jeroen; Gerola, Alessio; Hofbauer, Ben; Löhr, Guido; Rijssenbeek, Julia; Korenhof, Paulan
Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies Journal Article
In: Environmental Values , 2023.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Biomimicry, Cellular agricolture, Conceptual appropriation, Emerging technologies, Naturalness, Nature, Solar climate engineering
@article{Korenhof2023,
title = {Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies},
author = {Jeroen Hopster and Alessio Gerola and Ben Hofbauer and Guido Löhr and Julia Rijssenbeek and Paulan Korenhof},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/hopster-et-al-2023-who-owns-nature-conceptual-appropriation-in-discourses-on-climate-and-biotechnologies/},
doi = {10.1177/09632719231196535},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-21},
urldate = {2023-12-21},
journal = {Environmental Values },
abstract = {Emerging technologies can have profound conceptual implications. Their emergence frequently calls for the articulation of new concepts, or for modifications and novel applications of concepts that are already entrenched in communication and thought. In this paper, we introduce the notion of “conceptual appropriation” to capture the dynamics between concepts and emerging technologies. By conceptual appropriation, we mean the novel application of a value-laden concept to lay a contestable claim on an underdetermined phenomenon. We illustrate the dynamics of conceptual appropriation by analyzing the concept NATURE and its uptake in three discourses of emerging technology: cellular agriculture, solar geo-engineering, and biomimicry. We argue that NATURE and its cognate NATURALNESS are strongly valanced concepts upon which different stakeholders lay a claim. In doing so, stakeholders advance distinct conceptions of nature, typically to suit their own interests. Our case-studies illustrate how in discourses on emerging technology, the application of value-concepts is entangled with ideological stakes and power dynamics.},
keywords = {Biomimicry, Cellular agricolture, Conceptual appropriation, Emerging technologies, Naturalness, Nature, Solar climate engineering},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Emerging technologies can have profound conceptual implications. Their emergence frequently calls for the articulation of new concepts, or for modifications and novel applications of concepts that are already entrenched in communication and thought. In this paper, we introduce the notion of “conceptual appropriation” to capture the dynamics between concepts and emerging technologies. By conceptual appropriation, we mean the novel application of a value-laden concept to lay a contestable claim on an underdetermined phenomenon. We illustrate the dynamics of conceptual appropriation by analyzing the concept NATURE and its uptake in three discourses of emerging technology: cellular agriculture, solar geo-engineering, and biomimicry. We argue that NATURE and its cognate NATURALNESS are strongly valanced concepts upon which different stakeholders lay a claim. In doing so, stakeholders advance distinct conceptions of nature, typically to suit their own interests. Our case-studies illustrate how in discourses on emerging technology, the application of value-concepts is entangled with ideological stakes and power dynamics.
Gerola, Alessio; Robaey, Zoë; Blok, Vincent
What Does it Mean to Mimic Nature? A Typology for Biomimetic Design Journal Article
In: Philosophy and Technology, vol. 36, no. 81, 2023.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Biomimicry, Cellular agricolture, Nature
@article{Gerola2023,
title = {What Does it Mean to Mimic Nature? A Typology for Biomimetic Design},
author = {Alessio Gerola and Zoë Robaey and Vincent Blok },
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/s13347-023-00665-0/},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00665-0},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-18},
urldate = {2023-12-18},
journal = {Philosophy and Technology},
volume = {36},
number = {81},
abstract = {This commentary considers the typology and conceptual and normative heuristic framework as proposed by the authors as a valuable contribution to the new field of biomimetics philosophy and to the growing demand for critical evaluation of technology and design (decisions) in terms of ecological sustainability. However, further steps are needed to develop a more comprehensive normative analysis and evaluation. To inspire these efforts, I outline some additional normative dimensions of what I propose to call the ‘eco-normative profiling’ of technologies and design.},
keywords = {Biomimicry, Cellular agricolture, Nature},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This commentary considers the typology and conceptual and normative heuristic framework as proposed by the authors as a valuable contribution to the new field of biomimetics philosophy and to the growing demand for critical evaluation of technology and design (decisions) in terms of ecological sustainability. However, further steps are needed to develop a more comprehensive normative analysis and evaluation. To inspire these efforts, I outline some additional normative dimensions of what I propose to call the ‘eco-normative profiling’ of technologies and design.
Buhr, Lorina
The Eco-Normative Profiling of Technology and Design: a Commentary on ‘What Does it Mean to Mimic Nature? A Typology for Biomimetic Design’ Journal Article
In: Philosophy & Technology, vol. 36, iss. 4, pp. 81, 2023, ISSN: 2210-5441.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Biomimetic Design, Biomimicry, Eco-Normativity
@article{Buhr2023b,
title = {The Eco-Normative Profiling of Technology and Design: a Commentary on ‘What Does it Mean to Mimic Nature? A Typology for Biomimetic Design’},
author = {Lorina Buhr},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00681-0},
doi = {10.1007/s13347-023-00681-0},
issn = {2210-5441},
year = {2023},
date = {2023-12-18},
urldate = {2023-12-18},
journal = {Philosophy & Technology},
volume = {36},
issue = {4},
pages = {81},
abstract = {This commentary considers the typology and conceptual and normative heuristic framework as proposed by the authors as a valuable contribution to the new field of philosophy of biomimetics and to the growing demand for critical evaluation of technology and design (decisions) in terms of ecological sustainability. However, further steps are needed to develop a more comprehensive normative analysis and evaluation. To inspire these efforts, I outline some additional normative dimensions of what I propose to call the ‘eco-normative profiling’ of technologies and design.},
keywords = {Biomimetic Design, Biomimicry, Eco-Normativity},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
This commentary considers the typology and conceptual and normative heuristic framework as proposed by the authors as a valuable contribution to the new field of philosophy of biomimetics and to the growing demand for critical evaluation of technology and design (decisions) in terms of ecological sustainability. However, further steps are needed to develop a more comprehensive normative analysis and evaluation. To inspire these efforts, I outline some additional normative dimensions of what I propose to call the ‘eco-normative profiling’ of technologies and design.