ESDiT Publications

@article{Dudzik2024,

title = {Viewpoint: Hybrid Intelligence Supports Application Development for Diabetes Lifestyle Management},

author = {Bernd J. W. Dudzik and Jasper S. van der Waa and Pei-Yu Chen and Roel Dobbe and Inago M.D.R. de Troya and Roos M. Bakker and Maaike H. T. de Boer and Emre Erdogan and Pinar Yolum and Shihan Wang and Selene Baez Santamaria and Lea Krause and Bart Kamphorst},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.15916

https://www.esdit.nl/15916wpgs/},

doi = {10.1613/jair.1.15916},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-07-10},

urldate = {2024-07-10},

journal = {JAIR – Journal for Artificial Intelligence Research},

volume = {80},

abstract = {Type II diabetes is a complex health condition requiring patients to closely and continuously collaborate with healthcare professionals and other caretakers on lifestyle changes. While intelligent products have tremendous potential to support such Diabetes Lifestyle Management (DLM), existing products are typically conceived from a technology-centered perspective that insufficiently acknowledges the degree to which collaboration and inclusion of stakeholders is required. In this article, we argue that the emergent design philosophy of Hybrid Intelligence (HI) forms a suitable alternative lens for research and development. In particular, we (1) highlight a series of pragmatic challenges for effective AI-based DLM support based on results from an expert focus group, and (2) argue for HI’s potential to address these by outlining relevant research trajectories.},

keywords = {Diabetes lifestyle, Digital health, Digital health intervention, Healthcare},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hummel2024b,

title = {Perspectives of patients and clinicians on big data and AI in health: a comparative empirical investigation},

author = {Patrik Hummel and Matthias Braun and Serena Bishoff and David Samhammer and Katharina Sietz and Peter A. Fasching and Peter Dabrock},

url = {https://www.esdit.nl/perspectives-of-patients-and-clinicians-on-big-data-and-ai-in-health/},

doi = {10.1007/s00146-023-01825-8},

issn = {1435-5655},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-01-07},

urldate = {2024-01-07},

journal = {AI & SOCIETY},

abstract = {Big data and AI applications now play a major role in many health contexts. Much research has already been conducted on ethical and social challenges associated with these technologies. Likewise, there are already some studies that investigate empirically which values and attitudes play a role in connection with their design and implementation. What is still in its infancy, however, is the comparative investigation of the perspectives of different stakeholders.},

keywords = {AI, Big data, Digital health},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Nickel2023b,

title = {Justice and Empowerment Through Digital Health: Ethical Challenges and Opportunities},

author = {Philip Nickel and Iris Loosman and Lily Frank and Anna Vinnikova },

url = {https://www.esdit.nl/s44206-023-00075-x/},

doi = {10.1007/s44206-023-00075-x },

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-10-10},

urldate = {2023-10-10},

journal = {Digital Society},

volume = {2},

abstract = {The proposition that digital innovations can put people in charge of their health has been accompanied by prolific talk of empowerment. In this paper we consider ethical challenges and opportunities of trying to achieve justice and empowerment using digital health initiatives. The language of empowerment can misleadingly suggest that by using technology, people can control their health and take responsibility for health outcomes to a greater degree than is realistic or fair. Also, digital health empowerment often primarily reaches people who already have high technological and health literacy, leaving others behind. We critically investigate whether the concept of health empowerment could be re-engineered to mean something different, namely the process of improving the health literacy and access of those who least possess it, in line with recent proposals for conceptual engineering in the service of justice. We settle on the weaker conclusion that underlying ethical values including justice should be used to interpret the existing concept of empowerment. To conclude, we take a high-level view of various strategies for achieving the ethical value associated with digital health empowerment.},

keywords = {Access to care, Conceptual engineering, Digital health, Equity, Ethics of Technology, Health  literacy, Health empowerment, Justice, Responsibilization},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Responsible design and assessment of a SARS-CoV virtual reality rehabilitation programme: guidance ethics in context},

author = {Merlijn Smits and Geke Ludden and Peter-Paul Verbeek and Harry van Goor},

doi = {10.1080/23299460.2022.2076986},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-05-24},

journal = {Journal of Responsible Innovation},

volume = {9},

issue = {3},

pages = {344-370},

keywords = {Digital health, Guidance ethics, Responsible design, SARS-CoV, Virtual reality},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {How Digital Therapeutics Are Urging the Need for a Paradigm Shift: From Evidence-Based Health Care to Evidence-Based Well-being},

author = {Merlijn Smits and Geke Ludden and Peter-Paul Verbeek and Harry van Goor},

doi = {10.2196/39323},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-05-06},

journal = {Interactive Journal of Medical Research},

volume = {11},

number = {e39323},

issue = {2},

keywords = {Decision-making, Digital health, Well-being},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}