@article{Puzio2024b,
title = {Towards an Eco-Relational Approach: Relational Approaches Must Be Applied in Ethics and Law},
author = {Anna Puzio},
url = {https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s13347-024-00753-9?sharing_token=myT770guIG5NPRTnru5p-ve4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY6zDiN9WeE-Kg6yFt6J6cLYDtfiC8X3lkou9Lw3p2TF_UuhEUb37xWDcxxO4PNy8vVKJNVYwrgHGSlkQ-zhyV_iyRqjZUXWiZKnpCXpKckGAn6tQW9QpzanX0pjEhkuwCY%3D},
doi = {13347-024-00753-9},
issn = {2210-5441},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-05-25},
urldate = {2024-05-25},
journal = {Philosophy & Technology},
volume = {37},
issue = {2},
pages = {67},
abstract = {Relational approaches are gaining more and more importance in philosophy of technology. This brings up the critical question of how they can be implemented in applied ethics, law, and practice. In “Extremely Relational Robots: Implications for Law and Ethics”, Nancy S. Jecker (2024) comments on my article “Not Relational Enough? Towards an Eco-Relational Approach in Robot Ethics” (Puzio, 2024), in which I present a deep relational, “eco-relational approach”. In this reply, I address two of Jecker’s criticisms: in section. 3, I deal with the connection of personhood and human identity with relationality, and in section. 4, I discuss the consequences of relational approaches for practical ethics and law. Unlike Jecker, I am strongly convinced that relational approaches can and should be implemented in applied ethics and law.},
keywords = {Relational ethics},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
