2024

Dennis, Matthew; Annemans, Daan
Reimagining Digital Well-Being Technical Report
2024.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Digital well-being, Well-being
@techreport{Dennis2024,
title = {Reimagining Digital Well-Being},
author = {Matthew Dennis and Daan Annemans},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/wp-content/uploads/Reimagining-Digital-Well-Being_REPORT.pdf, download report},
year = {2024},
date = {2024-06-03},
urldate = {2024-06-03},
abstract = {This report aims to offer insights into cutting-edge research on digital well-being. Many of these insights come from a 2-day academic-impact event, The Future of Digital Well-Being, hosted by a team of researchers working with the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) in February 2024.
Today, achieving and maintaining well-being in the face of online technologies is a multifaceted challenge that we believe requires using theoretical resources of different research disciplines. This report explores diverse perspectives on how digital well-being can be actively cultivated, while also emphasising the importance of considering individual differences, societal contexts, and nuanced cultural factors. We aim to offer a holistic view of the future of digital well-being, one that will inspire the next generation of designers of online tools, as well as policymakers who will regulate these tools.
We start by asking what digital well-being is – how we can best define a concept that is used by diverse stakeholders and researchers from many disciplines in various ways. To do this, we explore the classic ethical theories of well-being, showing how they can give us insights into how
the term digital well-being is currently deployed.
We then move to look at the existing strategies that have been proposed to actively cultivate digital well-being, exploring the business models that threaten digital well-being and the relative advantages of the digital and non-digital solutions that are currently proposed. On the one hand, digital tools – such as Apple’s Screen Time and app blockers such as Opal and Forest – integrate seamlessly with the digital lifestyles of users. They also create precise metrics for digital well-being, which facilitates their solutions to reduce screen time. On the other hand, non-digital solutions, including mindfulness practices, digital detoxes, and digital well-being coaching, offer a new set of tools to reconnect individuals to their natural rhythms and help to actively promote offline activities.
We then move to discuss diversity and how various groups of users have strikingly different digital well-being needs. Embracing neurodiversity in digital well-being is crucial as it strongly impacts the users’ experience of online technologies. When designing for diversity, organisations and designers alike need to prioritise customization for people with physical disabilities, mitigate harmful content for users with mental well-being conditions, address gender stereotypes and online harassment, and be designed in ways that recognize the very real risks of online technologies.
This report closes by examining cultural differences. We believe that non-Western conceptions of well-being offer rich sources for enhancing digital well-being insofar as these traditions can inform and inspire the designers of future online technologies. We focus on East-Asian and South-Asian traditions, although in further work we recognise it would be useful to investigate conceptions of well-being that are influential in the Gulf region, Africa, and South America. Each of these areas have ethical frameworks that discuss well-being in depth as well as a rich cultural heritage.
In conclusion, this report’s insights underscore the imperative of recognizing diversity in digital well-being, both in terms of cultural contexts and disciplinary perspectives. It emphasises the need for culturally responsive design methodologies and the integration of non-Western philosophical perspectives into current digital well-being research. Embracing this diversity, we believe, offers the best chance to create digital environments that prioritise well-being for users and the societies they live in across the world. Ultimately, we believe that it is not only about designing better online products; it’s about shaping a digital landscape that promotes well-being and flourishing for everyone.},
keywords = {Digital well-being, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {techreport}
}
Today, achieving and maintaining well-being in the face of online technologies is a multifaceted challenge that we believe requires using theoretical resources of different research disciplines. This report explores diverse perspectives on how digital well-being can be actively cultivated, while also emphasising the importance of considering individual differences, societal contexts, and nuanced cultural factors. We aim to offer a holistic view of the future of digital well-being, one that will inspire the next generation of designers of online tools, as well as policymakers who will regulate these tools.
We start by asking what digital well-being is – how we can best define a concept that is used by diverse stakeholders and researchers from many disciplines in various ways. To do this, we explore the classic ethical theories of well-being, showing how they can give us insights into how
the term digital well-being is currently deployed.
We then move to look at the existing strategies that have been proposed to actively cultivate digital well-being, exploring the business models that threaten digital well-being and the relative advantages of the digital and non-digital solutions that are currently proposed. On the one hand, digital tools – such as Apple’s Screen Time and app blockers such as Opal and Forest – integrate seamlessly with the digital lifestyles of users. They also create precise metrics for digital well-being, which facilitates their solutions to reduce screen time. On the other hand, non-digital solutions, including mindfulness practices, digital detoxes, and digital well-being coaching, offer a new set of tools to reconnect individuals to their natural rhythms and help to actively promote offline activities.
We then move to discuss diversity and how various groups of users have strikingly different digital well-being needs. Embracing neurodiversity in digital well-being is crucial as it strongly impacts the users’ experience of online technologies. When designing for diversity, organisations and designers alike need to prioritise customization for people with physical disabilities, mitigate harmful content for users with mental well-being conditions, address gender stereotypes and online harassment, and be designed in ways that recognize the very real risks of online technologies.
This report closes by examining cultural differences. We believe that non-Western conceptions of well-being offer rich sources for enhancing digital well-being insofar as these traditions can inform and inspire the designers of future online technologies. We focus on East-Asian and South-Asian traditions, although in further work we recognise it would be useful to investigate conceptions of well-being that are influential in the Gulf region, Africa, and South America. Each of these areas have ethical frameworks that discuss well-being in depth as well as a rich cultural heritage.
In conclusion, this report’s insights underscore the imperative of recognizing diversity in digital well-being, both in terms of cultural contexts and disciplinary perspectives. It emphasises the need for culturally responsive design methodologies and the integration of non-Western philosophical perspectives into current digital well-being research. Embracing this diversity, we believe, offers the best chance to create digital environments that prioritise well-being for users and the societies they live in across the world. Ultimately, we believe that it is not only about designing better online products; it’s about shaping a digital landscape that promotes well-being and flourishing for everyone.
2022
Ziliotti, Elena
An Epistemic Case for Confucian Democracy Journal Article
In: Critical International Review of Social and Political Philosophy, pp. 1-23, 2022.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Confucian political meritocracy, Confucianism, Democratic participation, Epistemic democracy, Political participation, Well-being
@article{nokey,
title = {An Epistemic Case for Confucian Democracy},
author = {Elena Ziliotti},
doi = {10.1080/13698230.2020.1838736},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-12-31},
urldate = {2022-12-31},
journal = {Critical International Review of Social and Political Philosophy},
pages = {1-23},
keywords = {Confucian political meritocracy, Confucianism, Democratic participation, Epistemic democracy, Political participation, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Wareham, Christopher
Age and Well-Being: Ethical Implications of the U-Curve of Happiness Book Chapter
In: Wareham, Christopher (Ed.): Chapter 17, pp. 243-256, Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Age, Happiness, Well-being
@inbook{nokey,
title = {Age and Well-Being: Ethical Implications of the U-Curve of Happiness},
author = {Christopher Wareham},
editor = {Christopher Wareham},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108861168.018},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-08-23},
pages = {243-256},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
chapter = {17},
keywords = {Age, Happiness, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
Smits, Merlijn; Ludden, Geke; Verbeek, Peter-Paul; van Goor, Harry
How Digital Therapeutics Are Urging the Need for a Paradigm Shift: From Evidence-Based Health Care to Evidence-Based Well-being Journal Article
In: Interactive Journal of Medical Research, vol. 11, iss. 2, no. e39323, 2022.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Decision-making, Digital health, Well-being
@article{nokey,
title = {How Digital Therapeutics Are Urging the Need for a Paradigm Shift: From Evidence-Based Health Care to Evidence-Based Well-being},
author = {Merlijn Smits and Geke Ludden and Peter-Paul Verbeek and Harry van Goor},
doi = {10.2196/39323},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-05-06},
journal = {Interactive Journal of Medical Research},
volume = {11},
number = {e39323},
issue = {2},
keywords = {Decision-making, Digital health, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2020
Tummers-Heemels, Ans I. M.; Hillen, M. F.; de Kort, Yvonne A. W.; IJsselsteijn, Wijnand A.
In: Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 18, 45-49, 2020.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Mental Health, Robotic animal companions, Robotics, Well-being
@article{Tummers-Heemels2020,
title = {Use of robotic animal companions in dementia care: a qualitative study of the immediate and long-term effects to enhance quality of life and feelings of wellbeing for individuals living with dementia},
author = {Ans I.M. Tummers-Heemels and M.F. Hillen and Yvonne A.W. de Kort and Wijnand A. IJsselsteijn},
url = {https://research.tue.nl/nl/publications/use-of-robotic-animal-companions-in-dementia-care-a-qualitative-s},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-06-01},
urldate = {2020-06-01},
journal = {Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 18, 45-49},
keywords = {Mental Health, Robotic animal companions, Robotics, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Robeyns, Ingrid
Wellbeing, place and technology Journal Article
In: Wellbeing, Space and Society, vol. 1, pp. 100013, 2020, ISSN: 2666-5581.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Capabilities, Capability approach, Place, Technology, Well-being
@article{Robeyns2020,
title = {Wellbeing, place and technology},
author = {Ingrid Robeyns},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558120300130},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2020.100013},
issn = {2666-5581},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
journal = {Wellbeing, Space and Society},
volume = {1},
pages = {100013},
abstract = {One of the strengths of a capability account of wellbeing is that it allows us to theoretically and empirically analyze at a quite practical level why certain things matter to people - such as their housing, their jobs, and their friendships. A capability account of wellbeing is also very well suited to understand the importance of place for wellbeing. Some dimensions of wellbeing are constitutively place-related, such as “feeling at home”. Other dimensions of wellbeing are affected by what the places and locations in which we live mean to us. Taken together, we call them “place-based capabilities”. Using a capability account of wellbeing allows us to use social scientific research to investigate the role of social, economic, demographic, political, ecological and technological processes on wellbeing. This paper illustrates this by investigating the role of recent technologies in enabling and expanding capabilities. On the one hand, technological change has dramatically expanded those capabilities. On the other hand, the use of those technologies has unintended consequences for other capabilities. The conceptual as well as empirical relationships between (place-based) capabilities and technology is therefore a complex one.},
keywords = {Capabilities, Capability approach, Place, Technology, Well-being},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}