2022

Jongepier, Fleur; Klenk, Michael (Ed.)
Routledge research in applied ethics. The philosophy of online manipulation Book
First, Routledge, 2022.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Digital Ethics, Ethics of manipulation, Moral philosophy, Philosophy of technology
@book{nokey,
title = {Routledge research in applied ethics. The philosophy of online manipulation},
editor = {Fleur Jongepier and Michael Klenk},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/the-philosophy-of-online-manipulation/},
doi = {10.4324/9781003205425},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-06-20},
urldate = {2022-06-20},
publisher = {Routledge},
edition = {First},
abstract = {Are we being manipulated online? If so, is being manipulated by online technologies and algorithmic systems notably different from human forms of manipulation? And what is under threat exactly when people are manipulated online?
This volume provides philosophical and conceptual depth to debates in digital ethics about online manipulation. The contributions explore the ramifications of our increasingly consequential interactions with online technologies such as online recommender systems, social media, user friendly design, microtargeting, default settings, gamification, and real time profiling. The authors in this volume address four broad and interconnected themes:
- What is the conceptual nature of online manipulation? And how, methodologically, should the concept be defined?
- Does online manipulation threaten autonomy, freedom, and meaning in life and if so, how?
- What are the epistemic, affective, and political harms and risks associated with online manipulation?
- What are legal and regulatory perspectives on online manipulation?
This volume brings these various considerations together to offer philosophically robust answers to critical questions concerning our online interactions with one another and with autonomous systems. The Philosophy of Online Manipulation will be of interest to researchers and advanced students working in moral philosophy, digital ethics, philosophy of technology, and the ethics of manipulation.},
keywords = {Digital Ethics, Ethics of manipulation, Moral philosophy, Philosophy of technology},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
This volume provides philosophical and conceptual depth to debates in digital ethics about online manipulation. The contributions explore the ramifications of our increasingly consequential interactions with online technologies such as online recommender systems, social media, user friendly design, microtargeting, default settings, gamification, and real time profiling. The authors in this volume address four broad and interconnected themes:
- What is the conceptual nature of online manipulation? And how, methodologically, should the concept be defined?
- Does online manipulation threaten autonomy, freedom, and meaning in life and if so, how?
- What are the epistemic, affective, and political harms and risks associated with online manipulation?
- What are legal and regulatory perspectives on online manipulation?
This volume brings these various considerations together to offer philosophically robust answers to critical questions concerning our online interactions with one another and with autonomous systems. The Philosophy of Online Manipulation will be of interest to researchers and advanced students working in moral philosophy, digital ethics, philosophy of technology, and the ethics of manipulation.
Klenk, Michael
(Online) manipulation: sometimes hidden, always careless Journal Article
In: Review of Social Economy, vol. 80, pp. 85-105, 2022.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: Autonomy, Digital Ethics, Manipulation, Social expectations, Social Influence
@article{Klenk2022,
title = {(Online) manipulation: sometimes hidden, always careless},
author = {Michael Klenk},
doi = {10.1080/00346764.2021.1894350},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
urldate = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Review of Social Economy},
volume = {80},
pages = {85-105},
keywords = {Autonomy, Digital Ethics, Manipulation, Social expectations, Social Influence},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2021

Klenk, Michael; Duijf, Hein
Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? Journal Article
In: Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 23, pp. 69-77, 2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Active responsibility, COVID-19, Digital contract tracing, Digital Ethics, Fairness
@article{nokey,
title = {Ethics of digital contact tracing and COVID-19: who is (not) free to go? },
author = {Michael Klenk and Hein Duijf},
url = {https://www.esdit.nl/s10676-020-09544-0/},
doi = {10.1007/s10676-020-09544-0 },
year = {2021},
date = {2021-11-01},
urldate = {2021-11-01},
journal = {Ethics and Information Technology},
volume = {23},
pages = {69-77},
abstract = {Digital tracing technologies are heralded as an effective way of containing SARS-CoV-2 faster than it is spreading, thereby allowing the possibility of easing draconic measures of population-wide quarantine. But existing technological proposals risk addressing the wrong problem. The proper objective is not solely to maximise the ratio of people freed from quarantine but to also ensure that the composition of the freed group is fair. We identify several factors that pose a risk for fair group composition along with an analysis of general lessons for a philosophy of technology. Policymakers, epidemiologists, and developers can use these risk factors to benchmark proposal technologies, curb the pandemic, and keep public trust.},
keywords = {Active responsibility, COVID-19, Digital contract tracing, Digital Ethics, Fairness},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}